Fiord GroupEnvironmental Engineering
Survey drone in flight over terrain
Survey drone in flight over terrain

Hydrology & flood engineering

Insights

Flood studies · Floodplain mapping · Water management reports · Rural water · EPA inland waters

Overview

Answers to the questions that come before a commission. Every piece here is written against a checkable regulatory or hydrological fact, with the primary sources listed at the foot of each page, and every question is answered on the page rather than gated behind an enquiry form.

Why this section exists

The reason this section exists is narrow. In Western Australia the honest answer to most flood and drainage questions is that it depends — and almost nobody publishes what it depends on. State planning policy changed at the end of 2025 and renamed the entire water management report family. DWER floodplain mapping covers twenty-six areas in a state of two and a half million square kilometres, and says so only inside a dataset description. Whether a farm dam needs a licence turns on a phrase — no sensible reduction — that is a hydrological calculation wearing legal clothing.

The same is true one level up, in environmental impact assessment. The EPA assesses water under a factor called Inland Waters, whose objective is a single sentence and whose issues section names the specific things it keeps encountering — buffers to wetlands and waterways in the South West, surplus water discharged to creeks, potash proposals on salt lakes, pit lakes, and a forty-year decline in South West runoff and recharge that every baseline now has to be stated against. That guidance is public, current, and almost never quoted back in plain language.

None of that is secret. It is just scattered across agency PDFs, superseded guidance and scheme text, in a form that assumes you already know which document to open.

Articles

All insights